7 AUGUST 2002
Casecnan Tunnel Built on a Fault Line

by FDC and Citizens’ IPP Review Commission

THE FREEDOM from Debt Coalition (FDC) and the Citizens’ IPP Review Commission (CIRC) have learned that the tunnel which diverts water from the Casecnan and Denip rivers towards the Pantabangan Reservoir, has been built on a geologic fault. The tunnel belongs to the CE Casecnan Water and Energy Co., Inc., which has a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contract with the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) for the delivery of water and the generation of electricity. CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. is a subsidiary of California Energy, a US company that now calls itself Midamerican Energy Holdings Company. Last July 4, the Inter-Agency IPP Review Committee cited financial and legal infirmities that made the Casecnan contract defective.

The FDC and the CIRC have learned that in December 2000, in the course of building the diversion tunnel, the contractors of CE Casecnan encountered a geologic fault line. This resulted in the collapse of a partially completed vertical surge shaft. After months of deliberation, further delaying the project, the company decided to abandon the collapsed shaft, as repairing it would be impractical "for timing and economic reasons". Instead its contractors excavated a new 550-meter tunnel and built a new 140-meter vertical shaft.

The FDC is not aware if CE Casecnan Water and Energy Co., Inc. ever reported this incident to the Philippine government. There has been no public announcement by the company or the NIA in the Philippine press. However, CE Casecnan did file a report with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (US SEC) about the collapse of the shaft in February 2001, two months after the incident occurred.

The report submitted by CE Casecnan to the US SEC confirms what the FDC and the CIRC were told by a source who requested anonymity, that the company hit a fault line as it was starting to build the tunnel from the Pantabangan end. The source also said that this is an indication that CalEnergy/Midamerican did not undertake any geotechnical study of the area in which it was building the tunnel, prior to the start of construction.

The Casecnan Project is an onerous deal forged between the Ramos government and Midamerican Energy Holdings, formerly known as CalEnergy or California Energy. Although the project was found lacking in technical merits, it was nevertheless approved by the Investment Coordinating Committee, an interagency committee co-chaired by NEDA and the Department of Finance, in 1995, at the instruction—behest—of then President Ramos. A key officer of CE Casecnan at the time the project was being deliberated by the ICC was a retired US brigadier general, Donald M. O’Shei, Sr., who, like President Ramos, graduated from West Point.

The questions about the technical merits of the project become more serious in light of the failure of the company to conduct appropriate geotechnical studies of the project site before it began construction of the tunnel. This explains why the company’s contractors hit a fault line. It is in this light that a thorough assessment of the structural soundness of the tunnel must be conducted by independent engineers with no links to the company, especially in view of the heavy payments the government, Filipino taxpayers and electricity consumers must make towards this project.

For the next 20 years, the National Irrigation Administration must pay CE Casecnan over $100 million a year for water and for electricity, whether or not the company actually delivers the volume of water and electricity that NIA has agreed to buy. Moreover in the event of force majeure such as an earthquake, CE Casecnan may even compel the Philippine government to buy it out at a price over and above what it paid for the tunnel—which it built along a fault line.

Could the Casecnan diversion tunnel be structurally defective? What kind of structure does the government expect to receive from CE Casecnan 20 years from now, after paying over $2 billion in water delivery fees and take or pay fees for electricity? Are we taxpayers and electricity consumers paying for a tunnel that at this moment is extremely vulnerable to an earthquake? Should an earthquake destroy this tunnel, seeing as it’s built on a fault line, do we have to shell out even more money?

In light of this discovery, we of the Freedom from Debt Coalition and the Citizens’ IPP Review Commission strongly reiterate our call to the Arroyo government to rescind the contracts of the National Power Corporation and the National Irrigation Administration with the CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc.

To pay over $2 billion for a defective tunnel would be criminal.

Maitet Diokno-Pascual
President, Freedom from Debt Coalition
Member, Citizens’ IPP Review Commission



REVIEW OF IPP CONTRACTS

The IPP Review Committee report was the result of months of investigation by an interagency body composed of the Departments of Finance and Justice and the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA). Its objective was to study the technical, financial and legal aspects of every IPP contract, in order to identify talking points the Review Committee could use when dealing with individual IPPs. Their aim was also to identify which costs, now being made by the National Power Corporation to the IPPs, could be lowered, to eventually lead to a lowering of consumers' electricity bills. The Review Committee is now in the process of renegotiating the contracts with the IPPs.
  1. Navotas Gas Turbine Power Plant Unit 1-3
  2. 700 MW Pagbilao Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plant
  3. 2 X 100 MW Mindanao Power Barges
  4. 15.73 MW Ormat Binary Cycle Geothermal Power Station
  5. 2 X 300 MW Limay Bataan Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
  6. Navotas Gas Turbine Power Plant Unit 4
  7. 105 MW Pinamucan Bunker-Fired Diesel Power Plant
  8. 58 MW Bunker Coal-Fired Diesel Generating Power Station (Iligan 1)
  9. 75 MW Ambuklao Hydroelectric Power Plant
  10. 40 MW Bunker Coal-Fired Diesel Generating Power Station (Iligan 2)
  11. 108 MW Subic Bunker-Fired Diesel Power Plant
  12. Bauang Diesel Power Plant Project
  13. Toledo Thermal Power Plant Complex
  14. 100 MW Binga Hydroelectric Power Plant
  15. 63 MW Cavite EPZA Diesel Power Plant
  16. 58 MW Bataan Diesel Cogeneration Power Plant
  17. 640 MW Leyte-Cebu (200 MW) & Leyte-Luzon (440 MW) Geothermal Power Plant
  18. 205.6 MW Naga Power Plant Complex
  19. Sual 1,000 MW Coal-Fired Thermal Plant
  20. 47 MW Mindanao I (Mt. Apo 1) Geothermal Power Plant
  21. 650 MW Malaya Thermal Power Plant Complex
  22. 140 MW Casecnan Multipurpose Project and Manablon Powerhouse
  23. 100 MW Zamboanga Bunker Coal-Fired DieseI Power Plant Project
  24. 50 MW General Santos Bunker Coal-Fired DieseI Power Plant Project
  25. Bakun Hydroelectric Power Plant
  26. 304 MW San Pascual Cogeneration Production Facility
  27. 354 MW San Roque Multi Purpose Hydroelectric Power Plant
  28. 1200 MW Ilijan Natural Gas Plant
  29. 48.25 MW Mindanao II (Mt. Apo 2) Geothermal Power Plant
  30. Caliraya-Botocan-Kalayaan (CBK) Project
  31. 16 MW Paragua Power Plant
Google

Web pcij.org

Search our Site
 
       
powered by FreeFind