![]() JULY - SEPTEMBER 2000 VOL. VI NO. 3
|
JELP also flouted provisions of a Marcos-era law that says housing developments of its category should set aside 30 percent of their area as open spaces. Neither did it comply with a provision that requires real estate companies to invest 20 percent either of the land area developed or its equivalent value in low-cost housing.
One would think that the President, of all people, should make sure that the actions of his companies are in strict compliance with the law. According to the constitution, the President's primary responsibility is to "ensure that the laws be faithfully executed." The constitution also recognizes that given the powers of the President, there should be more severe restraints and checks on these powers. Thus, Article VII, Section 13 of the charter says that the president and the members of the Cabinet should strictly avoid conflicts of interest. They are also banned from participating in any business or being financially interested in any contract or franchise from the government. That is why these officials are required to divest themselves of their business holdings.
Estrada, however, has always shown an impatience with the niceties of the law. And true to form, the President, as far as corporate records show, has not bothered with divestment - at least not until this year and only as far as one of his companies is involved. This is one reason why the business involvements of the President and his family members tread on delicate ground. Many of these businesses - whether real estate development, restaurants or manufacturing - involve the acquisition of government permits and clearances and regulation by various state agencies. The Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB), for example, the body tasked with policing real estate companies such as JELP, is directly under the Office of the President.
In addition, RA 6713, the Code of Conduct for Public Officials and Employees enjoins public officials to have a "modest lifestyle." As head of government, the President is expected to set the example.
It is obvious that Estrada's grasp of the responsibilities of the presidency is primitive. At the same time, however, he shows a keen appreciation of the perks of his position. Which may be why he does not bother to answer questions about his finances. He probably thinks he is above the law, and from the looks of it, he may be right. Take the JELP development in Antipolo. Although it had been warned as early as March 1999 by the Antipolo City Planning and Development Office that it had no clearance to develop the site, JELP never got around to obtaining the necessary permits. The Ombudsman's slowness in probing the discrepancies and missing entries in his statements of assets is another indication of the impunity that the President seems to enjoy.
It is possible that Estrada will get away with these infractions, as he always had in the past. But he sets a bad example. If the President does not comply with the laws of the land, who will?
Highlights of the PCIJ's Report on "The State of the President's Finances"
|