July 3, 2007 · Posted in: 2004 Electoral Fraud, 2007 Elections
Why you should doubt the Maguindanao election results
(UPDATED) As always, the devil is in the numbers.
More than six weeks after the May 14 elections, the controversy surrounding the Maguindanao elections has yet to be resolved. It all started with the supposed 12-0 shutout win of administration candidates in the province. This was followed by news of provincial elections supervisor Lintang Bedol saying that municipal certificates of canvass (MCoCs) were stolen, only to backtrack later by saying they were simply missing. Bedol himself went “missing” twice despite repeated summons from the Commission on Elections (Comelec).
Following the news of allegations of massive cheating in the province, the poll body ordered a recanvass of the results. The special body created to conduct the canvass had to resort to the second and fourth copies of MCoCs. The recanvassing of votes cast in the 22 towns resulted into a total of 195,823 votes for Team Unity candidate Juan Miguel Zubiri, and 67,111 for Genuine Opposition bet Aquilino Pimentel III.
While Pimentel remains ahead of the race, the latest tally today shows that Pimentel now only has a slim lead of 2,700. He earlier had a lead of 4,293; prior to the canvass, Pimentel was leading by 111,000. The results from Basilan, Zamboanga del Sur, Lanao del Sur, and towns Binan, Laguna and Bogo, Cebu will determine the 12th winning senator.
In Maguindanao, a look at the election results there reveals highly improbable figures and surprisingly high voter turnout.
Comparing the results from the “original” provincial certificate of canvass — which was set aside by the national board of canvassers — with the new set of documents shows unusual decreases and increases in the votes for certain senatorial candidates (see table).
|
MAGUINDANAO SENATORIAL ELECTION RESULTS
|
||||
|
CANDIDATE
|
NO. OF VOTES CAST
(in original Provincial CoC) |
NO. OF VOTES CAST
(in new Provincial CoC) |
VOTES ADDED (+)/
SUBTRACTED (-) |
% SHARE OF TOTAL VOTES CAST
|
|
Angara, Edgardo (TU)
|
195,171
|
193,990
|
-1,181
|
98.00%
|
|
Aquino, Benigno Simeon III (GO)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Arroyo, Joker (TU)
|
194,803
|
193,012
|
-1,791
|
97.00%
|
|
Bautista Martin (AK)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Cantal, Felix (PGRP)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Cayetano, Alan Peter (GO)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Cayetano, Joselito (KBL)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Chavez, Melchor (KBL)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Coseteng, Anna Dominique (GO)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Defensor, Michael (TU)
|
194,028
|
168,905
|
-25,123
|
84.89%
|
|
Enciso, Ruben (KBL)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Escudero, Francis Joseph (GO)
|
85,037
|
81,171
|
-3,866
|
40.80%
|
|
Estrella, Antonio (KBL)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Gomez, Richard (IND)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Honasan, Gregorio (IND)
|
69,613
|
64,978
|
-4,635
|
32.66%
|
|
Kiram III, Jamalul (TU)
|
86,122
|
86,122
|
-
|
42.53%
|
|
Lacson, Panfilo (GO)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Legarda, Loren (GO)
|
70,138
|
64,070
|
-6,068
|
32.20%
|
|
Lozano, Oliver (KBL)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Magsaysay, Vicente (TU)
|
87,236
|
85,822
|
-1,414
|
43.14%
|
|
Montano, Cesar (TU)
|
88,751
|
86,305
|
-2,446
|
43.38%
|
|
Oreta, Teresa (TU)
|
87,053
|
83,076
|
-3,977
|
41.76%
|
|
Orpilla, Eduardo (KBL)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Osmeña, John Henry (GO)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Pangilinan, Francis (IND)
|
52,355
|
50,068
|
-2,287
|
25.16%
|
|
Paredes, Zosimo Jesus II (AK)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Pichay, Prospero Jr (TU)
|
194,571
|
193,979
|
-592
|
97.50%
|
|
Pimentel, Aquilino III (GO)
|
67,057
|
67,111
|
+54
|
33.73%
|
|
Recto, Ralph (TU)
|
195,454
|
190,654
|
-4,800
|
95.83%
|
|
Roco, Sonia (GO)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Singson, Luis (TU)
|
196,157
|
194,242
|
-1,915
|
97.63%
|
|
Sison, Adrian (AK)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Sotto, Vicente III (TU)
|
195,575
|
184,556
|
-11,019
|
92.75%
|
|
Trillanes, Antonio IV (GO)
|
0
|
2,147
|
+2,147
|
1.08%
|
|
Villar, Manuel Jr (GO)
|
82,735
|
73,835
|
-8,900
|
37.11%
|
|
Wood, Victor (KBL)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
0.00%
|
|
Zubiri, Juan Miguel (TU)
|
195,823
|
195,823
|
-
|
98.42%
|
For example, the first set recorded a total of 194,028 for TU candidate Michael Defensor. After the second round of canvassing, his votes were reduced by as much as 25,123. Detained rebel leader Antonio Trillanes IV, who first got a “zero” vote suddenly got 2,147 votes. All the other “zero” votes remained unchanged in the final tally. The Supreme Court in 1966 declared a “zero” vote as statistically improbable.
Meanwhile, Pimentel’s votes increased by 54 from the first provincial CoC while that of Zubiri’s remained at 195,823. Comelec explained this large discrepancies by saying that election officers might have gotten it wrong the first time.
The table above also shows extremely high vote-percentage shares for TU candidates — Zubiri (98.42 percent), Edgardo Angara (98 percent), Luis Singson (97.63 percent), Prospero Pichay (97.50 percent), Joker Arroyo (97 percent), and Ralph Recto (95.83 percent).
Another suspicious pattern in the Maguindanao results is the unusually high voter turnout in all the towns, averaging at 96 percent. Shariff Aguak (99.29), Datu Piang (99.28 percent), Mangundadatu (99.12), and Talayan (99.06 percent) registered the highest turnouts.
|
MAGUINDANAO ELECTION RESULTS
|
||||
|
MUNICIPALITY
|
NO. OF REGISTERED VOTERS
(Comelec May 3 Memo) |
NO. OF REGISTERED VOTERS
(as read by MBOC) |
NO. OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHO ACTUALLY VOTED
|
VOTER TURNOUT (%)
|
|
Ampatuan
|
10,658
|
10,613
|
10,308
|
97.13%
|
|
Buluan
|
10,118
|
10,118
|
9,849
|
97.34%
|
|
Datu Abdullah Sangki
|
8,186
|
8,186
|
7,939
|
96.98%
|
|
Datu Anggal Midtimbang
|
5,275
|
5,273
|
5,212
|
98.84%
|
|
Datu Paglas
|
12,126
|
12,126
|
11,908
|
98.20%
|
|
Datu Piang
|
18,492
|
18,492
|
18,358
|
99.28%
|
|
Datu Saudi Ampatuan
|
11,747
|
11,747
|
11,402
|
97.06%
|
|
Datu Unsay
|
10,172
|
10,172
|
10,051
|
98.81%
|
|
Gen. S.K. Pendatun
|
11,019
|
10,999
|
10,864
|
98.77%
|
|
Guindulungan
|
4,832
|
4,830
|
4,774
|
98.84%
|
|
Mamasapano
|
10,689
|
10,686
|
10,543
|
98.66%
|
|
Mangundadatu
|
4,683
|
4,683
|
4,642
|
99.12%
|
|
Pagagawan
|
10,578
|
10,574
|
10,304
|
97.45%
|
|
Paglat
|
4,682
|
4,682
|
4,528
|
96.71%
|
|
Pagalungan
|
10,484
|
2,837
|
2,439
|
85.97%
|
|
Pandag
|
3,650
|
3,650
|
3,382
|
92.66%
|
|
Rajah Buayan
|
6,815
|
6,815
|
6,712
|
98.49%
|
|
Shariff Aguak
|
27,392
|
27,386
|
27,191
|
99.29%
|
|
South Upi
|
12,272
|
12,272
|
9,461
|
77.09%
|
|
Sultan sa Barongis
|
8,632
|
8,632
|
8,530
|
98.82%
|
|
Talayan
|
6,567
|
6,567
|
6,505
|
99.06%
|
|
Talitay
|
4,122
|
4,121
|
4,057
|
98.45%
|
|
TOTAL
|
213,191
|
205,461
|
198,959
|
96.50%
|
Note: The figures and percentages have been updated following additional data from the Comelec
Moreover, in the old PCoC, Singson had the highest number of votes. But in the new tally, Zubiri emerged number one. “The first was unbelievable, the second simply magic,” Pimentel’s lawyers said.
In 2004, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo had the same statistically improbable number of votes obtained in Maguindanao. In at least two towns, Arroyo’s votes even equaled the number of actual voters, 9,321 in Ampatuan and 17,250 in Datu Piang. In both towns, as in many places in the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), the opposition’s highly popular candidate, Fernando Poe Jr., failed to garner a single vote.
Pimentel has his hopes pinned on the high tribunal, which had given him 10 days to file his motion for reconsideration after it denied his petition to stop the Maguindanao recanvassing. The Supreme Court ruled that the Pimentel failed to prove that votes counted by the Comelec were “spurious.”
“Members of the opposition earlier protested the inclusion of the results in Maguindanao in the overall count following fraud allegations. Zubiri meanwhile wanted the votes in the province included, saying that not doing so would disenfranchise its voters. (See related posts here and here.)







16 Responses to Why you should doubt the Maguindanao election results
jr_lad
July 3rd, 2007 at 2:18 am
of course it is doubtful. so why not the Comelec declare a failure of election and then call for a special election? i think that’s the best solution to this nagging problem. i think it would be fair to all parties concerned also. let the people decide whom they want to represent them. and there’s no reason for any party to call foul again. each one should guard his own vote. as senator lacson said during the 2004 presidential race, a candidate who cannot protect his votes does not deserve to win the race.
Toro
July 4th, 2007 at 7:58 am
Comelec cannot declare there was failure of election because election indeed took place, ballots were counted in the presence of party reps, and SOVs and COCs were complied with and submitted. The controversial issues were the mishandling of the missing COCs by Lintang Bedol and the reported 12-0 win by the UT in some towns. The missing COCs were eventually recovered and found to be allegedly untampered, though Koko Pimentel claims the COCs must have been compromised, and wanted them excluded from the count. The Supreme Court ruled that unless Koko could prove his allegations the Maguindanaoans cannot be excluded and disenfranchised. Besides, the proper venue for protest is the senate electoral tribunal, it added. As to the improbabiity of the UT winning 12-0, it’s probably that personal biases have made some people believe that it cannot happen even in one town just because the UT was clobbered nationwide. As to claims that there were cheatings, was there ever an election that there was none?
Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose » Blog Archive » Mystery at Pagalungan
July 4th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
[...] Fascinating account in PCIJ’s Why you should doubt the Maguindanao election results: [...]
ChoIo
July 5th, 2007 at 1:14 am
Even in the COC from Maldives (Overseas Absentee Voting) where only 2-persons actually voted, only 17-candidates got ZERO vote.
From Afghanistan where only 9 voted, 13 got ZERO vote.
From India where 40 voted, only 4 got ZERO vote.
And, from New Zealand where 60 voted, NONE got ZERO vote.
So, how can proclaimed winners Lacson, Cayetano, Aquino and Trillanes getting ZERO if these COCs from Maguindanao with 200,000 votes are not manufactured?
gwaping
July 5th, 2007 at 3:40 pm
CHEATING OR NO CHEATING, MGA KABABAYAN KONG SELF-RIGHTEOUS, EVERYTHING IS MOOT AND ACADEMIC. GO or TU in the senate doesn’t matter anymore, kahit si Kokok (the impostor Pimentel) pa ang umupo, wala ring binatbat ang mga hardline GOs, in the end, the presidential dreams of Lacson (the beast), Loren (the paCute) and Mar (the silent operator) are at stake at the end of the day. Villar (the Villain) destroyed ‘em ‘ol, kawawa naman si Pimentel (the real Pimentel). Cayetano (the Liar) and Chiz (the Betrayer) all the while ay hindi naman pala opposition. ngekkkk. Tapos ang laban, ang Senado para sa administrasyon pa rin hahahahaha. Si Jinggoy naman, nasabihan lang na si JV ang paboritong anak ni Erap, nagtampo na hahahaha kay Villar din daw pala siya…PAANO na si Trillanes hurrrrrrrrrrr
ChoIo
July 6th, 2007 at 3:30 am
Here are the results for the provincial positions (I found hidden at COMELEC website). See how the 7-8 TU Senatoriables are more popular than them.
May 14, 2007 National and Local Elections
CERTIFIED LIST OF ELECTED LOCAL CANDIDATES
MAGUINDANAO
POSITION / NAME OF CANDIDATE VOTES
REPRESENTATIVE
DATUMANONG, SIMEON AMPATUAN 180,808
GOVERNOR
AMPATUAN, ANDAL SALIBO 182,273
VICE GOVERNOR
AMPATUAN, SAJID ISLAM UY 182,045
PROVINCIAL BOARD MEMBERS
1 ABUTAZIL, ZAINUDIN M. 124,659
2 ADZIS, DATUWATA U. 129,380
3 AMPATUAN, NUALI S. 132,363
4 AMPATUAN, PUTI M. 140,560
5 AMPATUAN, SARIP K. 154,252
6 DATUMANONG, BORGIVA TASMI D. 141,564
7 MIDTIMBANG, MICHAEL E. 125,974
8 MONTAWAL, ALLAN P. 116,709
9 PENDATUN, ABBAS JR. A. 130,796
10 SINGH, SUKARNO E. 130,358
jr_lad
July 6th, 2007 at 8:23 pm
isn’t it incredible? approx 95% voter’s turn-out. ang sisipag naman ng mga taong bomoto sa magindanao.
equally incredible is the blanking of 19 senatorial candidates, including the extremely popular ones like Allan Peter Cayetano, Panfilo Lacson, Benigno Aquino III, and Antonio Trillanes IV who received zero votes in all 22 municipalities in Maguindanao.
i don’t really think it’s just because of personal biases. who would believe such a phenomenon could happen? as what cholo just raised above, even magindanao’s local officials received less votes than the TU senatoriables.
and as what PCIJ here wrote in a previous blog, it is “statistically improbable” that a zero vote occurred based on the results on other Muslim Mindanao areas where even the tailenders like Victor Wood, etc. garnered some votes.
yan ang sinasabi kong subrang garapalan.
ChoIo
July 8th, 2007 at 5:41 am
We should also look deeper into allegations by the camp of Pimentel that results from six(6) towns in Mindanao were statistically improbable.
Below were reported by media:
Shariff Kabunsuan
1. Sultan Kudarat
Registered Voters: 39,326
Voters Who Actually Voted: 38,672
Zubiri: 33,882
Pimentel: 2,791
2. Kabuntalan
Registered Voters: 10,225
Voters Who Actually Voted: 6,838
Zubiri: 5,465
Pimentel: 426
3. Datu Blah Sinsuat
Registered Voters: 8,203
Voters Who Actually Voted: 8,195
Zubiri: 7,105
Pimentel: 2,833
Lanao del Norte
4. Sultan Naga Dimaporo
Registered Voters: 27,201
Zubiri: 24,560
Pimentel: 114
5. Salvador
Registered Voters: 17,646
Zubiri: 15,797
Pimentel: 402
Sultan Kudarat
6. Lutayan
Registered Voters: 26,291
Voters Who Actually Voted: 25,546
Zubiri: 23,452
TOTAL for the 6-towns
Registered Voters: 128,892
Zubiri: 110,261 (86%)
NAMFREL do not have tallies for these towns. This gave way for poll operators to manipulate the results.
Naga: At the Crossroads « Postcard Headlines
July 12th, 2007 at 12:37 am
[...] Meanwhile, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism focuses its lenses on “Why you should doubt the Maguindanao results” in a three-part series. The second part can be viewed here while the third part is here. Two international leftist webzines, the International Viewpoint and the WSWS, also gives us the a glimpse of how some factions of the International Left view our electoral exercise. [...]
INSIDE PCIJ » Why you should doubt the Maguindanao election results - 4
July 12th, 2007 at 6:50 pm
[...] Aside from the statistically improbable votes, anomalous voting pattern, and the election results from the town of Pagalungan, Verzola says that the Maguindanao CoC contains some “statistically impossible” numbers when it comes to the ballot fill-up rate. [...]
i-site’s 2007 Election Files » Why you should doubt the Maguindanao election results - 4
July 17th, 2007 at 9:29 am
[...] Aside from the statistically improbable votes, anomalous voting pattern, and the election results from the town of Pagalungan, Verzola says that the Maguindanao CoC contains some “statistically impossible” numbers when it comes to the ballot fill-up rate. [...]
INSIDE PCIJ » Halal: Investigate electoral fraud in Maguindanao
July 24th, 2007 at 11:13 pm
[...] Halal is calling for a thorough investigation of the Maguindanao election fraud. Read Halal’s fourth audit report. [...]
i-site’s 2007 Election Files » Halal: Investigate electoral fraud in Maguindanao
July 31st, 2007 at 11:49 am
[...] Halal is calling for a thorough investigation of the Maguindanao election fraud. Read Halal’s fourth audit report. [...]
INSIDE PCIJ » Will Koko suffer his father’s fate?
July 31st, 2007 at 10:56 pm
[...] spot, was manufactured. (See the PCIJ series Why you should doubt the Maguindanao election results 1, 2, 3, 4, and [...]
INSIDE PCIJ » Bedol punishment seen as ‘insufficient’
August 7th, 2007 at 10:36 pm
[...] and the 12-0 shutout win of Team Unity candidates (see the PCIJ series on the Maguindanao results: 1, 2, 3, 4 and [...]
Mass murder in Maguindanao : Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose
November 25th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
[...] out Placeholder on the senatorial results for Maguindanao in 2007. There’s Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5 of PCIJ’s “Why you should doubt the Maguindanao [...]