May 15, 2012 · Posted in: General
Cuevas tries to impeach Ombudsman
as witness
LEAD DEFENSE COUNSEL Serafin Cuevas tangled with his own witness in the person of Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales, grilling her in an effort to impeach her and weaken her credibility.
On the second day of her testimony before the senate impeachment court, Morales had revealed more details on the contents and movements of some 82 dollar bank accounts that her office says belong to Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona.
Cuevas asked Morales if she or her office had ever verified the information provided her office by the Anti Money Laundering Council (AMLC). Morales had told the court that the initial findings of her fact finding investigation were primarily based on documents provided by the AMLC.
Morales told Cuevas that her office has not been able to do its own verification, as this would mean having to approach each of the banks concerned. Foreign deposits are protected by the Foreign Currency Deposits Act, which puts an absolute veil of secrecy over these accounts.
To this, Cuevas said that Morales appeared to have swallowed the AMLC data without any kind of verification.
“You give us the impression that you swallowed hook line and sinker the entire contents submitted to you in response to your letter request (by AMLC),” Cuevas said.
“The presumption is that they would give me correct information.” Morales replied.
At one point, Cuevas also asked what authority Morales had to investigate the Chief Justice. Cuevas cited a previous Supreme Court ruling that he said states that any investigation of alleged misconduct must have a “direct relation and connected with the performance of official duties.” Cuevas said that this means the Ombudsman cannot just investigate “any malfeasance” but one that is “in connection with performance of official duty.”
To this, Morales said her power to investigate “encompasses anything that violates the law.”
Morales said the charge against Corona is for “accumulating wealth grossly disproportional to income.”







3 Responses to Cuevas tries to impeach Ombudsman
as witness
Julito Tigley
May 16th, 2012 at 11:23 pm
I think, Ombudsman Morales is a very credible witness. The documents in her hands are all products of the investigative monitoring of AMLC for suspicious accounts. It just happen that the account of CJ corona was one of them. The summoning of Ombudsman Morales by the defense was to find out the truth of the existence of those accounts. And Morales definitely told the truth without bias. That is the beauty of having an ombudsman who is fair and very qualified for the position. Corona is just a collateral damage of her good reputation.
osca pastrana
May 17th, 2012 at 11:45 am
cuevas et al are all sinungaling sa mukha nila tumama ang bomba na kanilang hinagis buti nga sa kanila si atty. roy mukhang indigenous people sinungaling na de primera
Julito Tigley
May 20th, 2012 at 10:19 pm
Morales is subpoenaed as a witness of the defense, because they wanted it. All testemony so far are very credible. However, the defense can degrade it by denying or consider it as hoax. But lately, Emamnuel Dooc, a member of the AMCL authenticate it and also rationalize that the council is impartial. It is now Coronas side to defy the allegations base on proof. If his intent is just to deny it, it wont give any help to him. It will only prove that he has dirty bone in the closet. Asside, his Basa Guidote malfeasance can be resurfaced, and it will sanction it back to the real owner. Corona swindled the Basa family, through the help of the sherrif who execute a fasified decision, even if Jose Basa was dead already. What kind of CJ is Corona? He will be a model of a corrupt Judiciary if the foolish senators, vote for his acquital.