December 7, 2006 · Posted in: Charter Change, Congress Watch, In the News
‘The tyranny of the majority’
THE House of Representatives at 5:37 this morning approved through viva voce or voice voting a resolution convening Congress into a constituent assembly.
The marathon sessions that started Monday came to a swift end when the majority voted to adopt House Resolution 1450 (see the revised version, renamed House Resolution 197, below), which calls for the convening of Congress to propose amendments to or revision of the 1987 Constitution. The debates and the period of interpellation lasted for about 10 hours.
Members of the opposition described the entire procedure as “unconstitutional, patently illegal, and immoral.”
“We can either go to court or we can say (the Constituent Assembly) is a sham and not participate at all,” Taguig Rep. Alan Cayetano said in an television interview this morning.
Senate President Manuel Villar also said that the Senate is determined to block the Lower House in convening Congress into a constituent assembly. Villar said they will bring the case before the Supreme Court. The Senate yesterday also adopted a resolution reiterating their stand that the Lower House could not proceed with the Constituent Assembly without the institutional participation of the Senate.
On Monday, the Senate committee on constitutional amendments will be holding its own sessions and it will be inviting people who would like to express their sentiments over the “railroading” of the process of amending the Charter. Meanwhile, the House of Representatives on Tuesday will be holding a “joint assembly” to start the process of proposing amendments.
Majority member Luis Villafuerte, who co-sponsored the resolution, said the Lower House will be sending invitations to the senators to join the assembly. “But if the senators would decide not to join, then they’re waving their right to participate.”
Last night, the minority bloc tried but failed to block the move of administration allies to approve HR 1450 through a simple vote of the majority. Opposition lawmakers insisted that the resolution should be approved by three-fourths vote of all members of the two chambers of Congress.
Even Makati Rep. Teodoro Locsin of the majority said that a three-fourths vote, regardless of which chamber, was needed to approve the resolution.
Assistant Majority Leader Edcel Lagman however insisted that HR 1450 only needed a simple majority vote since it is only a measure calling for the convening of Congress into a constituent assembly. The three-fourths vote, he explained, is only needed for the actual approval of amendments.
Minority Floor Leader Francis Escudero argued that Section 104 of House Rule 15 clearly states that any proposed constitutional amendments must have the support of three-fourths of all members of Congress. But Lagman said it is Section 105 and not Section 104 which applies to the issue.
Last Tuesday, the majority bloc, by a vote of 161-25, managed to amend Section 105 of House Rule 15, allowing the Lower House to propose constitutional changes without the concurrence of the Senate.
In the new rule, the sentence directing the House to follow the procedure for the enactment of bills in the adoption of resolutions proposing amendments to the Constitution was deleted. Under the Constitution and rules, a normal legislative process requires the participation of the Senate.
See how the congressmen voted on House Rule 15 here for the ‘yes’ votes and here for the ‘no’ votes. See the entire list.
HR 1450 reportedly has been signed by 173 congressmen or three-fourths of 230-member House. But critics say the majority wanted to do away with the three-fourths vote last night because they did not have enough number of votes. The House Journal reported that 189 lawmakers were present last night. It is estimated that 25 members of the opposition attended; this brings the number of the majority down to 164.
The debates last night also centered on “still unclear” constitutional amendments that the majority bloc wanted. When grilled about important issues (e.g. term limits, separation of powers, etc.) surrounding Charter change, Villafuerte for the most part remained evasive and maintained that some matters could be better discussed in a constituent assembly.
The Camarines Sur lawmaker also denied the existence of a technical working group that drafted the “simplified version” of the proposed amendments. Reports said the group was organized with representatives from the administration-backed political parties led by Constantino Jaraula as chair. Other members are Prospero Pichay Jr. and Simeon Datumanong of Lakas-CMD, Luis Villafuerte (Kampi), Gilberto Teodoro Jr. (Nationalist People’s Coalition), Laurence Wacnang (Atienza wing of the Liberal Party), Crispin Remulla (Nacionalista Party), and Ernesto Pablo (APEC party-list group).
Escudero also raised the issue of the majority’s plan to postpone the May 2007 elections to November. Should this happen, Villlafuerte said the term of the incumbent officials will be extended for another six months. He further explained that the terms of the those who will be winning on November will also be cut short by six months as their terms will expire on June 30, 2010.
But in a television interview this morning, Villafuerte admitted that it is still “unsure” if the 64 third-termers in the current Congress will be given a chance to run in the November elections. Critics say it is this set of lawmakers who will benefit the most from Charter change. (See related post: House Cha-cha moves: A case of conflict of interest?)
The period of interpellation also included questions on the rules and procedures which will be governing the Constituent Assembly. San Juan Rep. Ronaldo Zamora, for instance, said it worries him that there are yet no specific rules that will guide the Lower House in conducting the assembly. “We are developing a culture of legislative cutting corners,” Zamora said, “Let us do the right thing. I will not disagree on the point that we need to amend the Constitution. But I disagree that we should do it tonight, next week, or any time soon.”
Partido Manggagawa party-list Rep. Renato Magtubo zeroed in on the fundamental basis of HR 1450 which acknowledged the “growing clamor from various sectors of our society to amend or revise the Constitution.” He repeatedly asked Villafuerte for proofs of the supposed “clamor,” arguing that as far as his constituents (workers) are concerned, what they want are decent jobs and a wage increase.
In reply, Villafuerte said charter change is being pushed by groups like the Union of Local Authorities of the Philippines which gathered 12 million signatures for its so-called “people’s initiative,” but which the Supreme Court struck down for being void and unconstitutional as it “miserably failed to comply with the basic requirements of the Constitution for conducting a people’s initiative.”
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) meanwhile maintains that a constitutional convention is still the best way to amend the Charter. The CBCP branded the incident last Tuesday as “scandalously immoral,” “self-serving,” and “fraudulently illegitimate.”
Below is latest version of House Resolution 1450 (renamed House Resolution 197):
Republic of the Philippines
Congress of the Philippines
Quezon City, Metro ManilaThirteenth Congress
Third Regular SessionBegun and held in Metro Manila, Monday, the twenty-fourth day of July, two thousand six.
RESOLUTION NO. 197
RESOLUTION CALLING ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO PROPOSE AMENDMENTS TO, OR REVISION OF, THE CONSTITUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1, ARTICLE 17 OF THE CONSTITUTION AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, there is a growing clamor from various sectors of our society to amend or revise the Constitution;
WHEREAS, it is imperative that any proposal to amend or revise any provision of the Constitution shall adhere to the express provision of the Constitution as provided by Section 1, Article 17 of the Constitution;
WHEREAS, Section 1, Sub-paragraph 1 of Article 17 of the Constitution provides that: “Any amendment to, or revision of, this Constitution may be proposed by: the Congress upon a vote of three-fourths of all its members.”
WHEREAS, while there are alternate modes of effecting charter change, adopting the afore-cited Constitutional provision quoted in the immediately preceding paragraph hereof is the mode recommended by an overwhelming majority of the Members of Congress;
WHEREAS, in order to ensure that proposals to amend or revise the Constitution could be considered by Congress in an orderly and practical manner, a call for ALL THE MEMBERS of Congress to propose amendments to, or revision of, the Constitution shall be made, as this resolution proposes. Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, as it is hereby resolved by the House of Representatives, TO CALL ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1, SUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE XVII OF THE CONSTITUTION TO PROPOSE AMENDMENTS TO OR REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION AT THE PLENARY HALL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BATASAN COMPLEX, QUEZON CITY BEGINNING AT 10 O’CLOCK IN THE MORNING OF DECEMBER 12, 2006 UNTIL THE APPROVAL OF THE PARTICULAR AMENDMENTS OR REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR SUBMISSION TO THE PEOPLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RATIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4, ARTICLE XVII OF THE CONSTITUTION.
Adopted,
Jose de Venecia Jr.
SpeakerThis Resolution was adopted by the House of Representatives on December 7, 2006.
Roberto P. Nazareno
Secretary General







18 Responses to ‘The tyranny of the majority’
joselu
December 7th, 2006 at 7:21 pm
How can the senators ever participate in a Con-Ass where their very power will be threatened.
Surely, this case will end up in the SC.
I just hope it it will be addresed clearly once & for all.
I can understand why change & evolution can be so complicated & emotional in this country?
What is wrong w/ a proposal for change that will ultimatly be decided & voted upon by the people in a plebicite.
Why are there some people pretending to much to represent the people? The question is w/c people & what interest do they really represent?
why do we have the culture of “blocking’ & ‘harangan”?
Problems & issues are never faced squarely.Why?
Does anybody care to explain the pros & Cons of the change that is being proposed w/o confussing it w/ personalities?
I think it is false to conclude that people do not want change.
I think the surveys taken w/ leading questions can’t be a bases to make so many conclussions.
At the end of the day it is about voting.
Yes it will be about the numbers. Every debate & argument in the world is decided by numbers like it or not. It is also part of democracy. Why is it then for the loseing side suddenly “numbers” become a tyranny? Are there not supposed to to winners & losers to every issue? Or is it simply the pinoy way of being the perpetual “pikon” who can never admit to defeat but will insted brand the other side w/ all possible faults.
I can’t but conclude that that many word going around are not based on reason & logic but insted on so much perception, speculations & so much incomplete & polluted information.
I just hope that the destiny of this country will not be threatened by some Velarde who exploits peoples religious weakneses.
I just hope that these are the times to be in control of emotions & really think things hard.
lutongmakaw
December 7th, 2006 at 8:59 pm
THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE ” THESE PEOPLE CANNOT BE TRUSTED; INCLUDING THERE VERY LEADER GMA” , THAT WHY THEIR EFFORT MUST BE THWARTED ASAP.
naykika
December 7th, 2006 at 10:31 pm
Whoever said that the power of the senators as individuals are threatened? Maybe the house of senate, the same as the house of of representatives will both be replaced by a unicameral body called house of Parliaments or whatever they framers want to call it. The senators themselves can run and become members of the said unicameral body, the same as the current representatives or congressmen. So joselu, nobody’s power is threathened here, both bodies are going to disappear in a proposed parliamentary system. The way I look at it from half way the world…
rubenmanga
December 8th, 2006 at 1:10 am
I tend to agree with naykika’s posting that both members of the two Houses of our Congress (Senate and Lower House) are “threathened” to loose their current grip on power. But the issue that I would like to get back to is the constitutionality of what the majority of the Lower House just did.
I am not a lawyer, but some yearning inside me made me do a bit of research on the core issue of whether the constitution, as interpreted by the majority in Congress, allows amending our Constitution based on the “mathematical” majority count of all the senators and congressmen.
Since we adopted a “bicameral” form of legislature, I found out that in amending a constitution, “majority of both houses” or “majority of all its members” (from both houses) must ratify the amendment/s, and a majority vote means A MAJORITY VOTE OF EACH OF THE HOUSE. This is the accepted international standard in any bicameral legislature (UK, Australia, Germany, USA).
What the majority just did in pushing through with the con-ass mode is a violation of not just our constitution but a deviation from internationally accepted legislative standards.
Diego K. Guerrero
December 8th, 2006 at 5:08 am
The 197 resolution is a piece of trash authored by greedy traditional politicians. Resolution 197 is adopted by the lower house only and must need a senate version to be effective. In its wordings, it does not call to convene constituent assembly. What they call it? Congressional Assholes?? These shameless pigs are doing every dirty trick just to fool the Filipino people. Let’s kick their asses thy kingdom come.
Ambuot Saimo
December 8th, 2006 at 6:29 am
December 7, 2006, a date which will live in INFAMY- and the beginning of the end of Gloria!!!
Like the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 which ultimately forced the still undecided United States’ entry into the Second World War (U.S. then was still contemplating of staying neutral)which Japan later admitted that it “awakened the sleeping giant”, this action of the majority congressmen is also a direct attack on the HONOR, WILL, AND INTELLIGENCE of the Filipino people and will be the rallying point that will Aawaken and ignite the “still passive or stoic” Filipinos to join massive actions until Gloria and minions are removed from power.
LET’S BEGIN NOW!!!
baycas
December 8th, 2006 at 7:07 am
by amending Section 105 of the House Rules, the HOR ALONE can adopt resolutions proposing amendments to or revision of the charter (doing away the bicameral nature of tackling proposals!).
by approving HR 1450 (renamed HR 197), ALL members of the Congress are now called on to file resolutions proposing constitutional amendments or revisions – giving a semblance of a convened Congress despite the expected snob of members of the Senate. (definitely, this will NOT be a Congress assembled in joint session and as such will not amount to a Constituent Assembly, more so, will not produce an Act of Congress!)
by adopting the published Rules of the Con-Ass, congressmen and/or senators will be made EQUALS not as legislators but as component elements of the constituent assembly – Rule I Constituent Power, Section 3…(emphasis on the word “OR” because, with the addition of the word, i gather that congressmen sans senators CAN already constitute a Con-Ass!)…thereby allowing even just 195 congressmen voting to propose amendments to or revisions of the charter. (this, in effect, will give you three-fourths of all the members of Congress!)
…isn’t it tyrannical for the majority (the Lower Ass) to impose their unilateral wish when all the while the two chambers of the legislature are supposed to function separately to come up with a JOINT resolution?
i don’t think the Senate will just feel threatened and make Upper Asses of themselves by not doing anything. i am sure when this whole thing becomes justiciable next week CJ Reynato et al will have full hands.
jester-in-exile
December 8th, 2006 at 9:51 am
at the very least, it’s disrespect for co-equal co-members of the legislative branch.
ethics complaint, anyone?
to_agol
December 8th, 2006 at 4:51 pm
sa tingin ko ginawa na akong bobo ng mga Majority Cong.
dami problema ng bansa yan ang inuuna nila. kng matutuloy na yan at plebisito gagastos ng 2.5bilyon. kng ang 2.5 bilyon na yan ginawang tulong sa Albay eh di mas maganda.
Alam kasi nila malaki ang tyansa matalo ang mga yan sa election. at kng maging majority ang opposition sa lower house tyak lagot si GMA.
si IGGY ARROYO na yan. Congresman namin yan sa 5th Distric Negros Occidental. dami kalokohan yan. Jose Pidal nga. wala naman nagawang maganda sa distrito namin.
hindi naman yan komokonsulta sa nasasakupan nya. binobobo lng kami.
Halata naman sa mukha ni GMA dapat magCha-cha na.
tongue in, anew
December 9th, 2006 at 5:25 am
Threatened ang Senado? Baka ikamo ang threatened e yung mga Tongressmen ni Donya na walang kapanapanalo sa eleksiyon, dito na lang is-shortcut ang pagre-reelect sa pamamagitan ng ConAss.
This ConAss will not go far, believe me. Ngayon pang nagsama-sama na ang lahat ng relihiyon! E sino pa ang boboto sa kanilang ConAss? Lalo lang nilang ibinaon ang sarili nila sa hukay. Pretty soon, isa-isa nang mag-aatrasan yang mga ulupong na iyan dahil sa takot matalo sa susunod na eleksiyon.
Wanna bet, gwaping?
tongue in, anew
December 9th, 2006 at 5:56 am
Sorry, hindi pala si Gwaping. Si Joselu pala, yung member ng silent majority na wala naman dito sa PCIJ (kaya nga silent, heheh)
INSIDE PCIJ » Arroyo allies call for con-con
December 9th, 2006 at 1:48 pm
[...] AMID protests from anti-Charter change groups, House of Representatives Speaker Jose de Venecia today announced that the Lower House was willing to postpone the constituent assembly while awaiting the Senate’s response to the call for a constitutional convention. [...]
INSIDE PCIJ » House drops constituent assembly plan
December 12th, 2006 at 11:07 am
[...] THE President’s allies in the House of Representatives are set to adopt today a resolution calling for a constitutional convention, superseding an earlier resolution on constituent assembly. [...]
INSIDE PCIJ » Charter change dead — or is it?
December 14th, 2006 at 11:50 pm
[...] An earlier survey by another polling body, Pulse Asia Inc., also showed that a greater number of Filipinos are against charter change. The clamor against it reached unprecedented heights when Arroyo’s allies in the House of Representatives pushed for a constituent assembly in “brazen disregard of the rule of law.” [...]
nielsky_2003
December 17th, 2006 at 8:42 am
Postscript to Con-Ass
To better understand what triggered the combined force of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Phillipines, El Shaddai, Iglesia ni Cristo, Jesus is Lord, and the Baptist Churches (as a collectivity), to move against the strong political current that was the Con-Ass initiative, a cognitive re-enactment of what transpired on December 6 and 7 is necessary.
The whole imbroglio was actually ignited when a motion at the Plenary was raised with regard to amending Section 105 of Article XV of the Rules of the House of Representatives. It was voted upon via nominal voting 161 to 25 in favor of the amendment. Not surprisingly, the majority won, the minority lost – on account of what is called the “tyranny of numbers”. Better still, call it plain and simple – gangsterism. One historian aptly said, the “House ran amuck”.
What followed – two sleepless nights on the row – is to vote upon House Resolution 1450 calling for the convening of Congress into a Constituent Assembly. Again, by viva voce vote, the tyrants or the gangsters conveniently imposed their will upon their minions – the minority bloc. The majority won, hands down. So who are the real “bullies in the schoolyard” that GMA was talking about?
Voting upon any motion or appeal from the ruling of the chair appears to be the simplest way of the administration’s dirty tricks department to solve all sorts of contentious issues. It is a ‘catchbasin stratagem’ that has no place in civilization. Literally enough, the situation, for the minority, means – hoping against hope. The “Old Boys Club” that is the majority with their bullies or frontline ‘operatives’ pulled the rug from under our feet – unabashed, unashamed, unafraid, unscrupulous.
Then, at a point in time when the House of Representatives is supposed to commence Day 1 under a Constituent Assembly and propose the ready-made package of constitutional amendments, good JDV served public notice that the Con-Ass is “archived” as a sign that the House of Representatives is sensitive to the sentiment of the people at large. For the first time in history, the majority lost in the bar of public opinion. And May 11, 2007 is a day when revenge is sweet assuming martial law is not declared.
The House caved in to the pressure of a converging inter-faith community moving against Con-Ass. Certainly, JDV and his conspirators know their arithmetic or political calculus: El Shaddai has 4 million, Iglesia ni Cristo has 8 million, CBCP has 85% of the entire population, Jesus is Lord has 3 million, and the Baptist Churches, as a clique, has anything in between the range. All told, JDV has to swallow the bitter pill than be remembered in history as the tyrant, the gangster leader, the bigot.
Of late, there are last-minute “fireworks” still going on. Rep. Golez, though not a lawyer, has never been more circumspect than making sure House Resolution 197 is killed for it cannot be buried alive. Ironically, according to Rep. Suplico, there is no term that can be found in the House Rules relating to the word, “archived”. It is simply non-existent and JDV, the perceived magician in the context of “if tails, I won; if heads, you lose”, is trying to doze water in a burning fire. The grand conspiracy is like merely removing one live bullet from a loaded double-barrel shotgun – it still kills.
The CBCP went to the extent of publicly inviting elements in the AFP to join their scheduled prayer rally pursuant to its role as protector of the people and the Constitution. This gives General Esperon a little bit of a problem and like a warrior, ordered all units in the entire AFP under a state of red alert. General Calderon in the PNP is given the same marching order. Against this backdrop, who says that “civilian authority is at all times supreme over the military”? Blind obedience should have no place in more contemporary militaries around the world.
After the People’s Initiative has failed, the Con-Ass has failed, too. Now, JDV is heading toward option C, and this is the Con-Con thing. It seems that JDV is trying again to bait the Senate into accepting it – hook, line and sinker – this despite the increasing public hatred against any mode toward charter change. Will the self-styled JDV want to test the turbulent waters again to his own peril? Good friend Joe, please put your House in order and don’t bluff! Patronage politics is long taboo.
nielsky_2003
June 17th, 2007 at 7:17 am
Is Trillanes’ case one of Catch 22?
The more immediate commonsensical question that may be raised by every man on the street would amount to this – “Why will Trillanes be not allowed to serve his term as senator-elect free from the crippling chain of any pending administrative or criminal charges”? Otherwise stated, no legal obstacle ought to be laid in his path when he comes to office and back where he lives. Certainly, the jail is for criminals and it would most inappropriately apply now to Trillanes who has been voted by 11.1 million people as the 11th senator-elect however proclaimed only in the 11th hour. It is a good thing Trillanes decided to file his candidacy however late in the day – to become the senator he now is amidst public perception that he will be the next icon of change in a rotting political landscape.
Alan Paguia has been quick to ask the Supreme Court on whether or not the public offices hearing Trillanes’ cases continue to have jurisdiction over them even while Paguia submits that said public offices would have been ousted of their jurisdiction over the pending cases. Of course, Paguia did not fail to invoke the principle that – “No public office has the authority to defeat the sovereign will”. As to what would be the sense of the Supreme Court on this inquiry is again but a waiting game. This early, Ping Lacson believes that mechanisms are available such as an arrangement where Trillanes may have to be billeted within Senate premises or as Pong Biazon also said, “Senate rules could be changed to accommodate Trillanes”. More proposals are surely forthcoming and it is high time the Supreme Court does the most correct preemptive judicial act.
For instance, one General Esperon appears to have been pushed on the wall to launch his limited-in-radius and cheap counter-propaganda saying that the court (in this case, the Regional Trial Court) should ask for a military pass that would allow Trillanes to leave military stockade with no less than him as the chief of staff or rather the ‘thief of staff’ (in so far as his Garci alleged involvement is concerned) as the single approving authority. This scheme and scene definitely presents a bad legal precedent where the will of a mere Chief of Staff of the AFP can prevail upon or supersede that of the will of the court. To think that the Chief of Staff of the AFP is subordinate to the Secretary of the Department of National Defense to which he falls under is clearly disconcerting. If that is not abuse of authority, tell me what is>
Viewed differently, the act of Esperon can be read as the desperate behavior of one whose head is about to be cut in the chopping board as soon as Trillanes traces back the historical track that led to Esperon’s possible involvement in the “Hello Garci” controversy. Trillanes’ newly-mandated role to serve as senator only means that he will turn the table on Esperon who had been likewise “heckled” by UP students when they threw “bugok na itlog” on him as a public statement that he is one of the rotten eggs of Philippine realpolitik. As Esperon did not as much as resent it or acted violently against those pitching hecklers should mean that he has sort of acknowledged the fact ‘civilian authority is supreme over the military’ yet now would quite knowingly and willfully disregard any sacred act of our courts.
For now, no one in the administration can build a legal castle in quicksand. Esperon and his rather arrogant AFP spokesperson who said he would rather call Trillanes as Mr. Senator than Honorable Trillanes must shift to low gear in their counter-propaganda drive as all the issues they embrace and invoke appear to stand on shallow legal grounds. Truly, if there is such a sovereign will that the Constitution itself, the courts, the justice secretary himself, the Supreme Court as an institution, and a well-meaning collectivity called a Republic of the Philippines – then it is the solemn thought that everything inferior subordinates itself to the sovereign will of the people.
It will bore a viewing universe to see a scenario where a judge would issue a court order that a military pass be issued by a general in the AFP in order to remove the handcuff to its prisoner (not even serving sentence yet much less been convicted) and be brought to the Senate where few meters away from the Plenary Hall, the prisoner’s handcuff would be removed by his military guards and then allowed to seat in a chair. And after session, the whole process is repeated. And day in and day out, this whole crazy routine will be repeated 365 days times 6 times. Have we become nuts? What is your take on this, Mr. Esperon and Mr. Bacarro?
PRIMER C. PAGUNURAN
U.P. Diliman, Quezon City Email: nielsky_2003@yahoo.com Cellphone: 09164985265
nielsky_2003
June 17th, 2007 at 7:21 am
In defense of Bro. Mike Velarde
The article, “Is there really a Mike Velarde vote factor?” written by columnist William M. Esposo (Philippine Star issue of May 10, 2007) is meant to, by and large, discredit the leader of the largest charismatic group in the country – Bro. Mike Velarde – on arguments that are flawed, self-contradictory, and purely subjective.
It may not be far removed that the writer may have an ax to grind (for reasons known only to him) against the most influential spiritual icon in Philippine politics in our contemporary times. And doing so, the writer has unwittingly displayed his stupidity even idiocy to the approximately 5 million Catholic (or even non-Catholic) followers of El Shaddai.
Philippine Star, the 3rd largest newspaper in the country in terms of circulation might have to lose about 5 million of its valued subscribers. Diminishing readership of Philippine Star, theoretically enough, will impact badly on the continuing economic viability of a newspaper under siege.
This gives columnist Esposo only two options: leave Philippine Star or ask for a public apology. At the very least, the Philippine Press Institute, if such exists, should subject Esposo to appropriate disciplinary action since his own ‘grandstanding and perorations’ in a lengthy but otherwise vacuous column are meant to cast aspersions on the person of Bro. Mike, in particular, and to the 5 million El Shaddai worshippers, in general.
Esposo’s submission that El Shaddai followers ‘have ceased patronizing Velarde’ is farthest from the truth. It has no basis in reality. And again, Esposo cleverly undermined El Shaddai by pitting it with Iglesia ni Cristo over who gave Erap higher percentage of support based on a 1998 SWS survey. That to me is pedantic logic. As if to reinforce this claim, Esposo conveniently made reference to the one seat garnered by Buhay Party List in a prior party-list election. What is the beef?
It is most unfair even unkind for columnist Esposo to accuse Bro. Mike of acts unacceptable to the Catholic faithful. If the CBCP exercised restraint than El Shaddai in endorsing candidates in the just concluded mid-term election, Bro. Mike cannot be faulted in providing a moral compass for his followers. Further, there ought to be an ‘open procedure’ in Esposo going about inquiring on where the contributions to El Shaddai go.
To accuse Velarde of indulging in dirty politics just because he endorsed politicians, supported Erap, and supported GMA is doubtlessly misleading. Truth is, Bro. Mike’s open espousal of his position against the charter change issue as being ‘rammed down through the people’s throat’ pushed the panic button and Malacanang caved in to pressure. If that were dirty of the man, what is clean?
SWS survey, old and new, were never perceived as unreliable. The problem with Esposo is his rather purposive use of old statistical data to prove a convoluted argument. For instance, to prove as though were reliable gauge of El Shaddai vote power is the one seat in Congress earned by Buhay in a prior election – is really disconcerting. The world knew that in this 2007 election. Buhay got the maximum of 3 seats as the number 1 party list with over 1 million votes. Bro. Mike’s endorsement of Buhay, among other factors, certainly explains the patronizing over a million vote garnered. And if Dr. Muga can only convince COMELEC of his new mathematical formula, Buhay must end up getting about 8 seats in the House of Representatives.
I shall be happy to send the good columnist a copy of our findings on why Buhay tops the list in the COMELEC’s counting chart should he so please. Esposo’s thesis ‘that Velarde’s endorsement adds nothing to the national pattern of voting’ runs in the opposite direction in so far as this May 2007 mid-term election stands as mute witness. Bottomline, Esposo cannot use an old key to open a new lock – for its different set of teeth. Or that can only be viewed as sheer idiocy. It is pity to be able to meet one such columnist of a supposed-to-be reputable newspaper.
In the end, laymen, bishops, leaders, followers do genuflect before Bro. Mike Velarde and this never-ending stream of more men and women celebrating prayer rallies with their beloved icon shall be as proverbial as the grass. Be among us – Bro. William!
PRIMER C. PAGUNURAN
UP Diliman, Quezon City
Email: nielsky_2003@yahoo.com Cellphone: 09164985265
nielsky_2003
July 18th, 2007 at 11:41 am
Speakership: anomaly of sort!
It is of questionable validity that a lone public figure in our realpolitik can seat himself next to automation as Speaker of a perceptibly Malacanang ‘rubber-stamped’ House of Representatives. JDV is no El Cid, is he?
Peripherally enough, the Constitution allows a politician, be him at the – Senate, Congress or at any level of the LGUs (Governor, Mayor, Councilor, etc.) – to serve for three successive terms in one political tier and on to the next. Thus, politicians can stay in the job as many years as they want under this rather oblique ‘ladderized program’.
But a resulting syndrome that may be characterized as “chronic addiction to the Speakership” unabashedly confronts us. And it escapes logic for JDV to morph himself, once again, as the “primus inter pares” in five punishing terms. Ask Solita Monsod if this is not a mockery of democracy.
What is doubly disturbing even insulting – across intelligences – is this having to patronize a trapo who has not contributed to society in more meaningful ways than propagate a norm of patronage politics. So-called ‘payolas’ became part of the territory.
Serious observers of trends, historians, scholars and students of law must later do a work in historical reconstruction to identify the pitfalls, weaknesses, even anomalies that characterized the state of affairs of the institution that JDV leads toward un-chartered frontiers.
Certainly, our economic metricians should have laid the yardstick against which institutional accomplishments must be measured. After all, the overburdened taxpaying public spent uncharacteristically huge amounts for their salaries and other district allocations, foreign travels, and pork barrel.
Ironically, taxpayers were misled to believe that a senator or a congressman receives only a monthly salary of P35,000. If lady Santiago’s tale were reflective of truth, they gross in million bucks at any given term – from kickbacks, commissions, and SOPs. Systemic corruption at every layer of the bureaucracy has taken roots, not the least at these chambers. No wonder, Lacson, Lim and Arroyo opted not to receive their pork barrels. No one in Congress, of course.
And it is not as if allegations of extortionist activities were mere cock-and-bull stories not to mention lobby monies from corporate giants plowing in. To think these were happening under JDV’s watch is already unconscionable. Add to this the already validated corruption index to the effect that 45% is lost to corruption – year in and year out.
And nobody really cried wolf even as many government employees have already become witness to the corrupt practices that have been more the rule than the exception. Paradoxically so, there has not been a single senator or congressman ever convicted of graft. And if not one of them can be convicted of graft, how much more of lesser crimes?
JDV may have, wittingly and unwittingly, turned the institution as an asylum and no judge nor court would dare tear at the fabric of Congress’ parliamentary immunity. Everyone who belongs to this ‘Old Boys Club’, call it even “The Big League” would enjoy this security blanket against summons, subpoenas, writs.
It would seem that as long as JDV is the speaker, every member would be free from harm’s way. No case against any of each member will be lodged with any degree of positive success. Ironically enough, the system of check and balance that is thought to result from the separation of powers of our three branches of government (Executive, Legislative, Judiciary) – turns into a myth. Not in the Philippines.
Until the pack of politicians that we will again have pay heed to the true dictates of their conscience, no bright future lies ahead. This vicious ‘political gangsterism’ has already caused irreversible peril – dried government coffers, nurtured subservience, damaged our collective psyche. Is there a way out of the noose? Pray tell there is.