April 24, 2006 · Posted in: 2004 Electoral Fraud, Comelec Watch, Gloriagate
SC to Comelec: Rehear Juliano case vs Sema
THE Supreme Court has ordered the Commission on Elections to rehear the proclamation protest filed by Cotabato City mayoral candidate Estrelita Juliano against the incumbent mayor, Muslimin Sema.
Juliano’s case was among those that ex-elections commissioner Virgilio Garcillano was caught discussing with provincial election supervisor Lintang Bedol in the controversial “Hello, Garci” tapes. The recorded conversations indicate that Juliano, a candidate of the opposition Koalisyong Nagkakaisang Pilipino, was not notified of the June 1, 2004 canvassing of the votes in Manila, which resulted in Sema’s proclamation.
In a unanimous en banc decision last April 12, the high court said the Comelec acted with “grave abuse of discretion” when it failed to order a rehearing even when the poll body, sitting en banc on Feb. 10, 2005, was equally divided on Juliano’s Oct. 23, 2004 motion for reconsideration of an earlier decision handed down by the Comelec’s second division.
The second division, composed of Mehol Sadain, Florentino Tuason Jr. and Manuel Barcelona, stood pat on its decision dismissing Juliano’s suit against Sema. But two of the three-member first division — Resurreccion Borra and Rufino Javier — ruled otherwise, along with Chairman Benjamin Abalos.
The deadlock could not be broken because Garcillano, the third member of the first division, decided against taking part in the proceedings. He gave no reason. Because of the tie, the Comelec en banc ended up affirming the second division’s resolution.
Garcillano, Sadain, Barcelona and Javier are no longer with the Comelec.
The Supreme Court pointed out that Section 6, Rule 18 of the Comelec Rules of Procedure specifically states that if the opinion of the Comelec en banc is equally divided, the case ought to be reheard.
“A rehearing clearly presupposes the participation of the opposing parties for the purpose of presenting additional evidence, if any, and further clarifying and amplifying their arguments,” the court said.
In seeking to nullify Sema’s proclamation, Juliano, the widow of Sen. Mamintal Tamano and the daughter of Teodoro V. Juliano, the first Christian ever elected as mayor of Cotabato and who held office for 20 years until his death in 1984, raised the following issues:
- She was never notified of the June 1, 2004 canvassing, originally scheduled on June 2.
- There were 108 contested election returns which she alleged to be spurious and manufactured and which, she said, would affect the result of the election.
- There were 54 election returns included by the Board of Canvassers in the canvassing which she said were not part of the inventory previously conducted.
Click here for the full text of the Supreme Court decision.







7 Responses to SC to Comelec: Rehear Juliano case vs Sema
schumey
April 25th, 2006 at 2:35 am
Garci Again…..holy cow, how much of this can we take? This Garci is quite an operator. I guess the three who sided with Sema must also have been on the take. To set aside hard evidence presented by Juliano only highlighted how the truth can be be blurred by these supposed to be guardians of our ballots. We really need to overhaul the Comelec.
tongue in, anew
April 25th, 2006 at 5:58 am
If you read the Hello Garci transcripts again, there was such a big fuss about the transfer of canvass from Cotabato to Manila. Even Barbers’ camp saw this as an opportunity to overhaul Biazon’s lead of about 39,000 as of May 25, 2004. The next day, Garci had this conversation with his secretary, Ellen Peralta:
Garcillano: Hello Len. I-remind nga sila kung nakapagpadala ba sila ng SOV 15 to 18 sheets sa kwan, sa Cotabato.
E. Peralta: Dito, sila ano, sila Ester?
Garcillano: Yun lang switch. Kung sinabihan sila ni Chairman kasi nagsabi raw si Chairman kagabi….
Garci was also called by GMA to confirm her 40,000 votes loss to FPJ in Cotabato. Her husband was also calling Garci on behalf of Barbers (June 2, 2004):
Mike: Hello, si Mike to. Kung pwede ho tulungan si Bobby Barbers.
Garcillano: Oo nga, pero mahihirapan na tayo, medyo nabuko tayo sa Lanao del Sur at hindi na makakahabol dito sa Cotabato.
Further, this was Garci’s conversation with Atty. Asdala
Garcillano: Nasaan ka?
Atty. Asdala: Cotabato. Supposed to be mag-convene kami kahapon (garbled). Pero Commissioner, ito nga ang problema ko, yung sa kay Teng ba. Kay Teng Mangudadatu. May kwan kasi dito, may pahabol si Barbers. Ang ginawa nila, itong Talitay tsaka Columbio, gusto nilang magsubmit ng bagong COC at tsaka SOV para mahabol yung si Barbers..
Grabe ‘no? Garapal! From the local to the party-list to the senatorial to the presidential, mukhang yung “switch” operations planadong planado.
This and other issues surrounding the 2004 polls will continue to haunt this government and the Senate’s “renewed vigor” to investigate the Garci scandal just might help Juliano in this case.
Toro
April 25th, 2006 at 7:57 am
Garapal talaga, Tongue in, dapat lang makulong yang taong yan. Ang akin, hindi talaga maaalis na may mandaya dahil lahat ng kandidato ay gustong manalo at sa naeksperiensya ko at nakausap kong kandidato nuong active pa ako sa Namfrel many years ago, napilitan silang mandaya dahil ang kalaban ay nandadaya din. Kung hindi daw dito hindi nila gustong mandaya, unang una na ay magastos at malaking halaga ang kailangan para manalo. Kaya mas matindi ang galit ko sa mga nagpapagamit tulad ni Garcillano, pati na rin yong si Michaelangelo Zuce na nag turn witness laban sa kanya, at mga katulad niya, matapos na makinabang sa kawalang hiyaan nila. Ngayon si Zuce tinanghal pang hero dahil bumaliktad sya kay Garci? Anong klaseng moralidad meron ba tayo?
naykika
April 25th, 2006 at 12:25 pm
On my way to the airport alone sunday morning, I asked my taxi driver (he was driving me around for the last few days) what he’ll do if he sees one of these guys along the road. Well, he said not much, he has kids to take care and send to college on his daily commision and I know it is a struggle. He asked me in turn and I said just about the same, but I may ask them for a dinner my treat and have a good “man” to “man” talk and mention his situation and millions of others like him. We parted ways at Niaa with enough tips as I suggested for a nice set of dentures cuz he likes to smile all the times, if only he could smile long after his driving days are gone and see his children with a bright future. So my appeal to those “Garapal” talaga, think about mang lito and his likes. thank you
freewheel
April 25th, 2006 at 9:16 pm
if elections,- said to be the basic form of expression in a participative democracy, is it not an understatement to call these people ‘garapal’ ?
in another post, i felt that those who alter with the citizens vote deserves no less than, death penalty.
Abalos, et al of Comelec, you should have taken your goodbyes long time ago.
” anong klaseng moralidad meron ba tayo? ” , asks Toro.
of course, they have their own brand of morality- it is akin to that of undomesticated pigs (term inspired by tongue in, ‘binababoy’).
tongue in, anew
April 28th, 2006 at 5:17 am
Hahaha freewheel, naalala mo pa pala.
INSIDE PCIJ: Stories behind our stories » ‘Hello, Garci’ lawyer to be promoted as judge?
June 26th, 2006 at 6:32 pm
[...] The Bedol board also caused the rescheduling of the canvassing for the hotly contested city mayoralty race, and then deciding to hold it a day earlier, supposedly without notifying Koalisyong Nagkakaisang Pilipino (KNP) candidate Estrelita Juliano and her counsel. A recent Supreme Court ruling, however, ordered the Comelec to rehear the proclamation protest filed by Juliano against the incumbent mayor, Muslimin Sema. [...]