by LT ANTONIO F TRILLANES IV PN

COMMANDER'S OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 19.615 1 .000

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the office of the Commander, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 17 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the office of the Commander, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 19.615 and significance level of 0.000.

DEPUTY COMMANDER'S OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.750 1 .053

ANALYSIS:
The chi-square test value of 3.75 and significance level of 0.053 would indicate to us that, at the office of the Deputy Commander, there are not enough data to conclude that corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 6 respondents who had perceived that there is corruption at the said office, 4 (66.66%) had boundary exchange processes, while 2 (33.33%) did not.

CHIEF OF STAFF OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.868 1 .015

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the office of the Chief of Staff, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 6 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the office of the Chief of Staff, 5 (83.3%) of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office while only 1 (16.66%). Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 5.868 and significance level of 0.015.

LOGISTICS OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 11.940 1 .001

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the Logistic Office, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 17 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the Logistic Office, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 11.940 and significance level of 0.001.

COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8.684 1 .003

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the Comptroller Office, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 10 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the Comptroller Office, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 8.684 and significance level of 0.003.

PROCUREMENT OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.000 1 .025

Continuity Correction 2.608 1 .106

Likelihood Ratio 6.009 1 .014

Fisher's Exact Test .054 .054

Linear-by-Linear Association 4.833 1 .028

N of Valid Cases 30

a Computed only for a 2x2 table

b 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.20.

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the Procurement Office, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 18 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the Procurement Office, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 5.000 and significance level of 0.025.

SUPPLY ACCOUNTABLE OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.667 1 .010

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the Supply Accountable Office, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 20 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the Supply Accountable Office, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 19.615 and significance level of 0.000.

COMMISION ON AUDIT
Chi-Square Tests

Value

Pearson Chi-Square .

N of Valid Cases 30

a No statistics are computed because Commission on Audit is a constant.

ANALYSIS:
The SPSS could not compute statistically the chi-square value and significance level of the given data because the variable of corruption perception at the Commission on Audit was misread as a constant since all the respondents perceived the COA to be corrupt. Nonetheless, by looking at the Cross Tabulation count, of the 30 respondents who perceived COA to be corrupt, 28 (93.33%) had boundary exchange processes at the said office. Hence, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related.

FINANCE OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.563 1 .010

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the Finance Office, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 14 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the Finance Office of the Commander, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 6.563 and significance level of 0.010.

TECHNICAL INSPECTION COMMITTEE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.982 1 .008

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the Technical Inspection Committee, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 13 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the Technical Inspection Committee, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 6.982 and significance level of 0.008.

BIDS & AWARDS COMMITTEE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.409 1 .065

ANALYSIS:
The chi-square test value of 3.409 and significance level of 0.065 would indicate to us that, at the Bids and Awards Committee, there are not enough data to conclude that corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 5 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the office of the Commander, 3 (60%) of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office while 2 (40%) did not.

ACCOUNTING OFFICE
Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.286 1 .038

ANALYSIS:
The data indicate to us that, at the Accounting Office, corruption propensity and boundary exchange are directly related. Of the 20 respondents who perceived that there is corruption at the Accounting Office, all of them had boundary exchange processes with the said office. Statistically, this is validated by the chi-square test value of 4.286 and significance level of 0.038.